The Reliability of Human Disambiguation in Text
MarkupKevinJ.KeenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Case Western Reserve Universitykjkeen@darwin.cwru.eduPaulA.FortierDepartment of French, Spanish, and Italian University of Manitobafortier@cc.umanitoba.ca1999University of VirginiaCharlottesville, VAACH/ALLC 1999editorencoderSaraA.SchmidtSemantic FieldsStudying semantic fields or literary themes in texts confronts researchers
with a paradox. A computer string search will produce a list of the
frequencies of words potentially related to the semantic field. But polysemy
implies an un-measurable difference between the potential allusion and the
real allusion. The semantic field of solitude is
important from sociological and psychological perspectives as an indication
of imperfect adaptation to one's milieu. It is also a frequently occurring
literary theme.The only practical response is disambiguation by human informants. But the
reliability of such a process is a concern. Singh (1986) and Fokkema (1988)
discuss the matter in a theoretical and speculative mode without systematic
empirical evidence. Nothing bearing directly on the topic can be found in
recent issues of Computers and the Humanities or
Literary and Linguistic Computing.The correctness of a given choice by an individual informant or rater is
generally unknowable. Usually, such a choice is a matter of degree and
judgment within the cultural context of a language. The consistency of
markup from one informant to another is a likely reasonable touchstone for
assessing the reliability of the disambiguation process.DataNine 20th century novels were chosen for this analysis: Bernanos, Journal d'un curé de campagne, Camus, L'Étranger and La Chute, Céline,
Voyage au bout de la nuit, Gide, L'Immoraliste and La Porte
étroite, Mauriac, Le Noeud de Vipères,
Proust, La Fugitive, and Sartre, La Nausée.French thesauri identify seventy words (in the sense of lemmata) related to
the concept of solitude. These strings were used to search the texts for
words potentially related to solitude in the ARTFL database. Words centered
in 60 characters of context were given to six informants with minimal
instructions: mark the words, which from a reading of the context, do not
evoke the concept of human solitude and go back to the ARTFL database for
more context in doubtful cases.Table 1 summarizes the number of allusions to human solitude. Note that the
range of the number of counts of allusions to solitude varies widely
according to the text examined.To assess the impact of providing a greater amount of context to informants,
300 characters of context from the original text were obtained using the
same set of strings as for 60 characters of context. Identical instructions
were given to six informants--two of whom participated in the first
project.Table 2 summarizes the number of allusions to human solitude for a context of
300 characters. When a larger context is provided, the range of variability
in the results increases. On the other hand, the consistency of the raters
is slightly improved.AnalysisThe sample intraclass correlation coefficient, denoted as formula ICC(3,1) by
Shrout and Fleiss (1979), has been chosen as the measure of agreement among
the informants. For dichotomous responses, an intraclass correlation
coefficient of one-quarter for a sample consisting of two informants is to
be interpreted to reveal that two informants were in agreement for
twenty-five per cent of the observations after correcting for the
possibility that any agreements of the two informants were entirely due to
chanceThe measure of reliability of a sum of responses from a random sample of a
set of a fixed number of raters drawn from a population of raters is known
as the Spearman-Brown prophecy after Spearman (1910) and Brown (1910).
Cronbach's alpha, due to Cronbach (1951), is an estimate of the
Spearman-Brown prophecy.Both the Spearman-Brown prophecy and Cronbach's alpha are increasing
functions of the intraclass correlation--parameter and statistic,
respectively--and each asymptotically equal 100% in the limit as the number
of raters increases without bound despite the consideration that adding more
raters only increases the chances that everybody will not agree.Statements made regarding a population based on a sample must be qualified by
a probability clause. The standard choice for a probability clause is such
that the statement be correct in the long run, if the statistical procedure
were to be done unboundedly many times, 95% of the time--or nineteen times
out of twenty. So a measure of the degree of difficulty associated with a
specific text in determining whether there is an allusion to solitude is
given by the minimum number of informants to achieve a value of 95% for
Cronbach's alpha nineteen times out of twenty.ResultsHypothesis tests revealed statistically significant differences regarding
reliability among the different texts and among the two character-string
lengths. Further exploratory analysis ruled out a particular informant, a
particular part of speech, or a particular class of frequency of use as
being influential.The 95% confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient are
given in Table 3 for both 60 character and 300 character groups surrounding
each type. Note that for each novel the confidence interval for rater
reliability is shifted to the left with the 300 character groups compared to
the 60 character groups. With more context, the estimate of reliability
becomes lower.Note the lack of overlap for the 95% confidence intervals for the two sizes
of character groups for each of the novels by Bernanos, Céline, and Proust.
It is conjectured that as the sample size surrounding each type increases,
there is more opportunity for subjectivity based on personal opinion.Table 4 presents the number of informants required to achieve 95% for
Cronbach's alpha nineteen times out of twenty for 60 and 300 character
contexts. For each novel, as the size of context increases, the number of
informants required to achieve 95% for Cronbach's alpha increases. Moreover,
the size of a jury to decide whether a word alludes to human solitude with
300 characters of context ought to be no fewer than 45 based on the novels
surveyed.With respect to literary analysis, note that the novels of Camus have a
greater spread in jury size than those of Gide.ConclusionIt appears that the use of informants for studying semantic fields, or
literary themes, is justifiable from a statistical perspective. However, the
large numbers of informants or jury members appears prohibitive.
Paradoxically, reliability appears to decrease as the number of characters
of content increases. Further studies are needed to determine whether
increases in reliability can be obtained by changing the focus from a word
to a sentence or longer passage.These results suggest a high degree of subjectivity when a single individual
scores the semantic content of literary data. The meaning of individual
words in context is a matter of opinion, and cannot be taken as definitive
until a high degree of consensus among a large number of raters or
informants is achieved.Table 1Scores for Human Solitude with 60 Characters of
ContextTextsrawp1p2s1s2s3s4BJC2606889514410091CET74221913112326CCH115324126313641CVN488891337841127153GIM89284236184748GPE108264136263754MNV159427047289271PFU304498057448276SNA233111113778695122Table 2.Scores for Human Solitude with 300 Characters of
ContextTextsrawp3p4p5s5s6s7BJC2609844154457351CET7423114861410CCH115373461233026CVN48815364199538560GIM89422949132522GPE108362949132522MNV1598032113284143PFU3046853126496944SNA23311496151677079Table 3.95% confidence interval: intraclass correlation
coefficientTexts60 Characters300 charactersLowerUpperLowerUpperBJC0.560.660.430.54CET0.480.680.290.51CCH0.680.790.540.69CVN0.510.590.420.50GIM0.400.590.280.48GPE0.430.600.330.50MNV0.470.600.330.50PFU0.630.710.490.59SNA0.590.690.480.59Table 4.Number of informants required for a value of 95% or more
for Cronbach's alpha nineteen times out of twenty.Texts60 Characters300 CharactersBJC1525CET1943CCH916CVN1826GIM2845GPE2537MNV2125PFU1219SNA1421Explanation of Symbols used in the Tables Texts: BJC: Bernanos, Journal d'un curé de campagne CET: Camus, L'Étranger CCH: Camus, La
Chute CVN: Céline, Voyage au bout de la
nuit GIM: Gide, L'Immoraliste
GPE: Gide, La Porte étroite MNV: Mauriac,
Le Noeud de Vipères PFU: Proust, La Fugitive SNA: Sartre, La
Nausée. Informants: raw: raw solitude data as downloaded from the ARTFL
database s(1-7): French Literature Graduate Student p(1-5): French
Literature ProfessorReferencesW.BrownSome experimental results in the correlation of mental
abilitiesBritish Journal of Psychology3296-3221910GeorgesBernanosJournal d'un curé de campagneOeuvres RomanesquesBibliothèque de la PléiadeAlbertBéguinParisGallimard19351961AlbertCamusL'ÉtrangerThéâtre, Récits, NouvellesBibliothèque de la PléiadeRogerQuilliotParisGallimard19451962AlbertCamusLa ChuteThéâtre, Récits, NouvellesBibliothèque de la PléiadeRogerQuilliotParisGallimard19561962L.-F.CélineVoyage au bout de la nuitRomansBibliothèque de la PléiadeH.MondorParisGallimard19321962J.CohenA coefficient of agreement for nominal scalesEducational and Psychological Measurement2037-461960L.J.CronbachCoefficient alpha and the internal structure of
testsPsychometrika16297-3341951DouweFokkemaOn the reliability of literary studiesPoetics Today9529-5431988AndréGideL'ImmoralisteRomans, Récits, Soties, Oeuvres lyriquesBibliothèque de la PléiadeY.DavetJ.-J.ThierryParisGallimard19021958AndréGidePorte étroiteRomans, Récits, Soties, Oeuvres lyriquesBibliothèque de la PléiadeY.DavetJ.-J.ThierryParisGallimard19091958FrançoisMauriacLe Noeud de VipèresParisGrasset1932MarcelProustLa FugitiveÀ la recherche du temps perduBibliothèque de la PleiadePierreClaracAndréFerré3 vol.ParsGallimard19251954Jean-PaulSatreLa NauséeOeuvres RomanesquesBibliothèque de la PléiadeMichelContatMichelRybalkaParisGallimard19381981P.E.ShroutJ.L.FleissIntraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater
reliabilityPsychological Bulletin86420-4281979GurbhagatSinghThe identity of the literary text: Problems and
reliability of reader response: An inquiry into theoretical
positionsThe Literary Criterion21449-571986C.SpearmanCorrelation calculated with faulty dataBritish Journal of Psychology3271-2951910